Brave has more privacy feature out of the box. LibreWolf which is Firefox with changed settings is superior. besides the site only shows if a privacy feature is present not how good it is.
LibreWolf is more slower than even Firefox. Getting 10% better privacy for half the performance and possible incompatibilities on the web is not worth it.
Please correct me if I am wrong, have not followed LibreWolf for a while. I did try it out for a bit. I believe they are just implementing some facets of the custom user.js [1] and custom policy files and then changing where cache files are stored.
I was not a fan of their cache location changes as I had to write custom rules in bleachbit [2] to vacuum/compress/clean database files created by LibreWolf. In a weird way I think they made their browser less private with that move as not everyone is going to write custom bleachbit rules.
there is no point in manually deleting cache since it's wiped when closed
I used to think this as well but bleachbit shows me every time I close my browser there is much to be cleaned. I launch firefox using firejail and then when firejail exits it calls bleachbit. Even if I use "History" -> "Clear recent history" and select "Everything" there is still a lot of crud to remove. Try it out if you have some spare time.
There's even a few things that bleachbit misses by default such as moz_historyvisits in places.sqlite and files in the datareporting directory that get created even if ff is told not to create them.
those are cache from the browser itself = not relevant for websites. just checked myself and they are always the same 3 files for every user with the same hash.
https://privacytests.org/
reply