"fake meat" is processed food. That, IMHO, is the main difference over just eating fresh vegetables. It's more expensive because of that, and introduces externalities and risks.
I see "fake meat" as a temporary crutch for people transitioning to vegetarianism.
I'm vegetarian, I like the taste of meat, I hate the taste of these "fake" meats and I'd much rather eat veggies
I really don't see the point of these, they barely taste as good as the cheapest frozen meat patty you can find. It's almost like cardboard patties with a hint of burned meat taste, and it costs as much if not more than meat in most restaurants.
You just don't want to. It's very simple: they let you have a burger that mimics meat burgers, and they taste reasonably close for some of us. I love burgers and love some of the fake meat patties since I don't usually eat meat. Simple as that.
It's not like animals have no risks or externalities. What's the critical difference between industrial processing vegetable matter into a fried patty, and a cow organically processing vegetable matter into flesh which is then turned into a fried patty? Cows getting BSE is what made my mother decide I would be "vegetarian at school" back in the late 80s. Overuse of antibiotics in the production of meat gets a significant share of the blame for the evolution of antibiotic resistant bacteria.
> I see "fake meat" as a temporary crutch for people transitioning to vegetarianism.
Most people demonstrably don't care enough about even the combination of the ethical, environmental, and the health the reasons for a better diet. Meat substitutes are aimed at most people.
I very much agree that it's an improvement for all involved. But I'll still suggest to my friends who consume fake meats that they try just eating the fresh vegetable ingredients.
I see "fake meat" as a temporary crutch for people transitioning to vegetarianism.
reply