Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

It shouldn't be just the companies that are barred from filling new notices, but that the copyrighted item itself loses its protection. But how could a bunch of old people who don't care about tech have put that into law 20 years ago


view as:

How would that have worked in this case? User posts Blender video $X on youtube, $idiotCompany files frivolous DMCA suit claiming copyright on $X, Blender loses its copyright on $X?

If $idiot is being paid by blender or acting at their request, yes, otherwise no

Legal | privacy