Maybe IPv6 should have had a stronger backwards compatibility story. Maybe not IPv4+ as described in a sibling comment, but something that lets me easily be compatible with IPv4 without having to do the whole setup again.
Having to actively manage 2 totally separate systems isn't economical at all, so it's no surprise that so few bother, myself included. I totally want to "switch to" (-> add) IPv6, but just can't justify the cost. There's nothing in it for me here, I would only lose.
Having to actively manage 2 totally separate systems isn't economical at all, so it's no surprise that so few bother, myself included. I totally want to "switch to" (-> add) IPv6, but just can't justify the cost. There's nothing in it for me here, I would only lose.
reply