Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Which again you have no source for. Reusable rockets are more expensive than single use rockets. That's just common sense. There's no proof that SpaceX is even cash flow positive.


view as:

I don't follow why reusable rockets would be more expensive. In fact, I don't think that's true.

> There's no proof that SpaceX is even cash flow positive.

And you have no proof otherwise. You just assert it without evidence.

And you disagree with everybody that has studied this topic. Pretty much everybody that has estimated cost comes down on the side that SpaceX core launch business is very profitable.

Tons of investors who had insight into this information seem to believe it was a good investment. If the numbers showed that it didn't make sense the whole credibility of Starlink and Starship would instantly collapse.

We don't have detailed numbers but its simply not credible that they have been launching for losing money.


Legal | privacy