Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

> At Twitter, every move he makes is contrary to his own interests.

While he may drive a Tesla and use Starlink, he didn't create SpaceX or swoop in and take control of Tesla as an obsessive customer with an agenda as a customer.

I don’t think that that entirely explains why Musk Twitter isn’t like Tesla or SpaceX, but I can’t imagine its not a significant factor.

(I also think that, distinct from his customer-agenda, him seeing it as an opportunity to relitigate his finance app history getting booted as CEO of X.com twice before it became PayPal is an issue that impacts more than the names he has used for the companies used in the Twitter acquisition.)



view as:

I believe the largest factor is that he never intended to buy it, tried to get out of buying it, when he had to buy it he didn't get enough investors and saddled Twitter with high debt, which made him turn to sharp "cost-cutting measures" which as a result lost him even more money and put him on a stressful downward spiral in which he's losing billion a year, and he can't stop it, and is constantly making bad decisions like an animal that the more it moves, the deeper it gets stuck into the shark's mouth.

It’s really the first bit that slightly stretches credulity. Like, presumably at some point some lawyer told him “this isn’t like a consumer contract, once you’ve signed you’ve signed”.

Maybe a lawyer told him. But was he listening?

He's definitely not the type that listens to his advisors, no. Which is not always a bad thing, and I think it got him where he is, but it feels like at some point he got overwhelmed by his own success and started thinking every one of his whims was gold.

Legal | privacy