Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

> I’m not sure why people think just because they have cameras that the police will follow up on the video evidence and make arrests

The plain answer to your question is that because some times they do. But the implication of your rhetoric is that they never will. That's the problem.

Being "made whole" is actually a separate concern from helping to catch the perp, and it doesn't help to brush off one concern in favor of another. Like for example if someone stole most of my computing gear, financial compensation by insurance could not possibly make me whole (months of bespoke setup and customization). But it would be nice to know that the perp got punished, regardless of whether they had already sold my stuff.

And personally, I'd double down on the cynicism and point to having video evidence as a good way of documenting the incident for insurance purposes, lest they attempt to screw you some how.

(Nothing in my comments should be construed as condoning having Internet connected cameras running proprietary crapware. Rather I'm just talking about the general motivation for cameras, and unfortunately many people are insensitive to the crapware)



view as:

Legal | privacy