Hacker Read

jerguismi | karma 1488 | avg karma 2.61 · 2012-04-12 13:53:58+00:00

I don't really get the benefits. You don't need servers, but you need to host the JS/html5 application somewhere, even if you don't need to configure the database server etc.

It is nice technology, but I don't really see if it is worth the price (vendor lock-in, technology lock-in, etc.)

reply

jamest | karma 3311 | avg karma 24.17 · 2012-04-12 14:29:02+00:00

Hosting can be handled much more efficiently / easily by someone designed just for content distribution, like a CDN. Our own site is 100% server from a CDN, which makes for very nice scaling characteristics. Also, it's free right now...

haberman | karma 20020 | avg karma 5.73 · 2012-04-12 11:03:11

Or with a scheme like Chrome Apps, the browser could store the app locally. The app could work offline and only use the server to sync/collaborate.

sawyer | karma 321 | avg karma 2.72 · 2012-04-12 16:11:05+00:00

Assuming you know how to build and deploy servers; what advantages would Firebase bring over say: a Socket.IO client -> NodeJS server setup where data was being stored and fetched from memory (Redis or some other data-store)?

SpiderX | karma 60 | avg karma 0.76 · 2012-04-12 17:37:47+00:00

Nothing, I guess... except perhaps scalability.