Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Completely agree with this take. I worked in FAANG and before that I worked in various startups.

Most of the people around me are very adapted to this very specific hyper-structured environment that we are in. This is not a criticism - they are thriving in this environment and everyone is happy.

But no way would I want to take these people with me on a new venture. (the inverse is also true; I would not take a shoot-from-the-hip go-getter and put them into a mature product environment that with intense legal scrutiny)



view as:

How do you reconcile your final paragraph/sentence with your own ability to succeed[1] in both environments?

My experience is that the ability to adopt to structured/unstructured environments are not mutually-exclusive: some people may thrive in one but not the other, and others can do well in both (or none!) My motto is to make the right trade-offs in any environment - which is a universal superpower for engineers in my book; especially when coupled with curiosity and a willingness to learn.

1. I'm taking the charitable presumption.


You might be too charitable. There were hard transition phases where I was not necessarily considered successful.

And I probably only made it through because my employer had deep pockets and chilled while I took time to adapt. The other direction (big co -> startup) is no where near as forgiving.

Mottos are fine, but what we need to succeed is skill and practice with skills.

We are susceptible to innovators dilemma on a personal basis, and it’s hard to break habits and intuition hardened over years in a different environment.

And when I was in start up land I did watch a lot imported talent from FAANG come in and bomb out - they were trying to care about long term code quality and we needed to slap together a demo in 48 hours. It was like oil and water

Edit: btw I don’t mean to signal that it’s impossible to do to be someone who thrives in both situations. It was a comment on the original suggestion of “just start a new company and hire up all these lay offs to get rich quick”. I believe that’s not going to be a good strategy


Great points on the direction! I'd love to hear the opinion of someone who started out in big tech and then transitioned to a startup.

Legal | privacy