Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

[flagged]


view as:

The ICC has arrest warrants out for Putin for his war crimes. I really can't believe you're wilfully this ignorant to say there has been no civilian targetting. How are cluster bombs on cities not pure indiscriminate murder?

Where are russian cluster bombs on cities happened? I thought the US provided Ukraine with cluster and gave them green light to start.

Search video. For example, Kharkiv was targeted by cluster ammunition, that's norm. Moscow terrors to drive out disloyal population, to hinder economy, to distract defenses from the front.

"Poland forced Germany to attack" (1939) by Putin, Moscow propaganda supports genocide. Atrocities in Bucha, Izum is result. Relatives? They speak nothing or support "liberation" by occupants.


The ICC’s arrest warrant is for evacuating children, not for targeting civilians.

"Otherwise Kiev would be rumbled by now."

It is not for lack of trying on part of Russia. They send plenty of missiles in that direction. It's just that Kiev is protected by modern air defenses more than any other Ukrainian city.

So far Russia has not hesitated completely destroying relatively large Ukrainian cities. If you need a link to the pictures, let me know.


That's quite a russian narrative. Mariupol alone is in vicinity of 100k civilian casualties. Kyiv holds because of air defense and denying ru air superiority by shooting them down. Ukrainians have plenty of issues with invading forces. Plenty.

Also, Yalta? What?


Official UN statement is 1300 death in Maripol. Please do not spread false info. Do some research first before talking. It creates a fake narrative where people fall into. Not good.

> Official UN statement is 1300 death in Maripol.

That's a lie.

https://edition.cnn.com/europe/live-news/russia-ukraine-war-...

> “The actual death toll of hostilities on civilians is likely thousands higher,” UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said... Bachelet added that right now it is "impossible to know" the exact death toll.

Even Russia doesn't think it's that low, and they've reason to want to undercount.

https://www.anews.com.tr/world/2022/12/30/russia-says-3000-c...

> Russian officials say that 3,000 civilians were killed in the attack on the Ukrainian city of Mariupol, in Moscow's first estimate of the death toll since the siege several months ago.


It isn't a lie as such, the UN has an official statement [0] saying that 1,348 people died. It is just an honest and reasonable misinterpretation.

But a lot more civilians than that were killed.

[0] https://www.ohchr.org/en/statements/2022/06/high-commissione...


That’s not a reasonable reading of that statement.

> To date, OHCHR has verified 1,348 individual civilian deaths directly in hostilities in Mariupol, including 70 children. These deaths were caused by air strikes, tank and artillery shelling and small arms and light weapons during street fighting. The actual death toll of hostilities on civilians is likely thousands higher.

The other comments by the same poster in this thread do not lead to the “honest” conclusion.


If the UN says "To date, OHCHR has verified 1,348 individual civilian deaths directly in hostilities in Mariupol" and then some dude says "Official UN statement is 1300 death in Maripol" that is an honest reading.

It isn't an accurate reading, but if you spend any time at all on the internet you will detect that honest people are often quite inaccurate. And wrong even while being able to back their opinions up with evidence. But it still isn't fair to imply that they are liar, lying or spreading lies. They are just wrong. Happens to literally all of us.

Even if hypothetically he was a habitual liar in every other comment he ever made on HN, this is not a showcase of lying.


If I tell you I went to a McDonalds potato warehouse, and that I counted twenty potatoes, but "there's a lot left to count", it would not be a reasonable summary of my statement to say that "the warehouse contains twenty potatoes".

But you would have the warped view of reality necessary to operate as a UN official, so you'd have something going for you :)

Doesn't affect holoduke though, and he could still honestly quote you as having viewed 20 potatoes.


[flagged]

[flagged]

No, Russia's goal is to keep Ukraine in their sphere of influence and prevent democracy from taking hold there, because if that happens in Ukraine people in Russia might start to think it's possible there as well. Also there are geographical reasons regarding border defense which are somewhat understandable, but overruling the will of the people of Ukraine for that is not considered acceptable anymore in this century.

Russia's actions in Bucha, Mariupol and just about everywhere in this war (Cherson during occupation comes to mind) have been horrid, as is its disregard for its own soldiers, many of whom are just used as cannon fodder. Russia is targetting civilians all over the place.

Those other wars are horrible too, but comparing them just by number of casualties is disingenious.


> Yes there are some exceptions like Bucha, Belgorod, Charkov, Yalta or Maripol events

It's pretty disgusting to reduce what happened to civilians in those cities to "some exceptions".


> There is no civilian targetting.

That's just plain wrong. Please read https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attacks_on_civilians_in_the_...


Legal | privacy