Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Well, one of OP's initial mistakes was that he thought LGPL was anywhere near "copyleft." It isn't.

For SaaS companies who just want to use the software on their backend and are not interested in redistributing it in any way, there's no realistic difference between LGPL and more permissive licenses like MIT and BSD.



view as:

It looks like I was wrong. From the code he did use the AGPL. I am confused as to why the article says LGPL. Typo? Tried both?

It was a typo/mixup. Correct is AGPL, not LGPL as in the article.

Legal | privacy