Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

This is a bit of FUD IMHO

Also, I've thought for some time that P2P car sharing should be over longer terms, like months.



view as:

With all the financial products the banking world creates, I'm sure someone will come up with an insurance policy for this. Sure it won't be cheap, but will be a solution.

Agreed. The market will sort this out. RelayRides needs to completely protect its car lenders.

Agreed

"That's why we can't have nice things"

Too much liability issues and because of (most likely) an irresponsible driver now they're (or better, someone that can pin any cost on the injured) goes after the car renter, car manufacturer, road authority, etc. They'll probably make a way for Steve Jobs to be liable as well if they can, I guess

"no longer theoretical" No crap sherlock. People have been getting injured in car accidents for the past 100 years.

By getting into a car and driving you assume a non zero risk of being injured or killed in a car accident. Do you want zero risk? Live in a bubble

Now his suddenly becomes a multi-million dollar cash cow for several 3rd parties.

Except for the victims of course, who'll have to deal with giant health costs (because of similar excess liability and regulation meandering by the authorities and greed by the medical industry)

Sure, liability is important, if it involved a drunk driver for example, or a fault that comes from the car maker.

But there's always a risk! And preventing some risks causes even more risks sometimes.


By getting into a car and driving you assume a non zero risk of being injured or killed in a car accident.

By getting into a car and driving you assume a non zero risk of being sued for damages caused by a car accident.


Except that in this story she didn't cause the accident.

> This is a bit of FUD IMHO

Would you care to tell us why? As-is, I could rewrite your comment as "Java is better than C IMHO" and it would be exactly as useful.


Take the single worst case possible and act as if this is normal = FUD

It is easy to spot this: if the article implies even in a slight degree that you'll die if you use a web service, it is FUD


Legal | privacy