Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Could they be converted into cheap housing?


view as:

I've seen one building like this in watertown ma. I think it was converted during a downturn. I used to walk by it, "riverbank lofts"

https://www.google.com/maps/@42.368276,-71.198303,3a,90y,169...

But while it could be done, most offices don't have the insides separated out (wiring,plumbing) installed and non-opening windows. And zoning.

It can be done, but it might not end up being cheap.


This is not usually possible because of the cost to run plumbing. You have to gut the entire facility in order to put kitchens and bathrooms in every apartment and it just isn't (usually) cost effective.

True in practice, though shared bathrooms & kitchens are no impossibility.

Yes, it costs some money, but it's been done countless times in old warehouses in cities and towns around the world.

Of course, I don't think modern office buildings will have the appeal of "exposed brick" and "thick wooden support beams", but maybe the people of 100 years ago would have thought the same about those buildings.


These places have slab floors, and jackhammering sucks, but that isn't the end of the discussion. They typically have really high ceilings, so false floors aren't impossible. Clever architecting can group plumbing-required rooms together. Also, if we're talking about low-income, alternative housing for singles and couples, is a janitor-included shared bathroom down the hall even a problem? Many of the old hotels that are used for this purpose also have this.

Lack of opening windows is a bigger deal. Replacing all the curtain walls and stripping the place down to concrete gets suspiciously close to new construction costs. The land had better be worth it.

I've seen in down quite successfully in dense urban locations for condos but that only worked because the land was highly valuable and the building had grandfathered exemption from zoning / sightline laws for height.


The insides of most office buildings would need a lot of rework before they were acceptable housing. And the end result would be ugly on the outside , and it'd be located in a deserted office park.

It seems like in most cases it'd be cheaper to either tear them down before rebuilding, or to just start building from scratch in a more desirable location.


Office buildings can be very hard to convert to residential uses.

Office tenants want large, unbroken floorplans, so most office buildings built in the last few decades have a lot of interior space that's far from any windows. Residential uses need windows for every unit.

Adding plumbing for individual kitchens and baths, creating separate HVAC zones, etc. adds more costs and complications.


Legal | privacy