Hacker Read
top
|
best
|
new
|
newcomments
|
leaders
|
about
|
bookmarklet
login
alimw | karma 436 | avg karma 1.19
2017-08-06 16:54:53
|
next
[–]
update item
I haven't read it closely, but it looks to me as if the calculation estimates the expected
number
of counterexamples rather than the "measure" of them (however you've chosen to define that).
reply
view as:
tree
latest_first
mathemancer | karma 6 | avg karma 0.86
2017-08-06 18:29:00+00:00
|
next
[–]
similar comments
The set of possible counterexamples has Lebesgue measure zero.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebesgue_measure
reply
Legal
|
privacy
reply