> Since there are African Americans and people with very little “indian blood”
I mean there are white people with little current Indian blood who meet the requirements because of an old ancestor. Why single out the African Americans?
> Citizenship is also based on ancestry in the USA (natural born citizen).
Sure, but the US is already a multicultural, multi-ethnic society, so... it would be more akin to a hypothetical US that ceased all immigration and naturalization, and only allowed natural born citizenship for a hundred years or so. I do agree that many other countries do this kind of thing, and I'm not sure it's good there either.
I mean there are white people with little current Indian blood who meet the requirements because of an old ancestor. Why single out the African Americans?
> Citizenship is also based on ancestry in the USA (natural born citizen).
Sure, but the US is already a multicultural, multi-ethnic society, so... it would be more akin to a hypothetical US that ceased all immigration and naturalization, and only allowed natural born citizenship for a hundred years or so. I do agree that many other countries do this kind of thing, and I'm not sure it's good there either.
reply