I can't help but roll my eyes at the the introduction's "unregulated facial recognition software" part of the introduction. That is a meaningless term given the lack of regulation in the first place examples and says in itself nothing about the effectiveness. The "Clipper Chips" infamous Skipjack was regulated. It annoys me mostly because meaningless rhetoric looks like they have no defensible stance.
That rant aside I am curious if this technique will lead to more resilent facial recognition and image parsing techniques to find the shape. Obviously the fact humans can still recognize it is a hint there is some other algorithim possible.
That rant aside I am curious if this technique will lead to more resilent facial recognition and image parsing techniques to find the shape. Obviously the fact humans can still recognize it is a hint there is some other algorithim possible.
reply