Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I often quote this comment regarding AI advances and jobs [0]:

> Yes, many of us will turn into cowards when automation starts to touch our work, but that would not prove this sentiment incorrect - only that we're cowards.

>> Dude. What the hell kind of anti-life philosophy are you subscribing to that calls "being unhappy about people trying to automate an entire field of human behavior" being a "coward". Geez.

>>> Because automation is generally good, but making an exemption for specific cases of automation that personally inconvenience you is rooted is cowardice/selfishness. Similar to NIMBYism.

It's true cowardice to assume that our own profession should be immune from AI while other professions are not. Either dislike all AI, or like it. To be in between is to be a hypocrite.

For me, I definitely am on the side of full AI, even if it automates my job away, simply because I see AI as an advancing force on mankind.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32461138#32463198



view as:

It’s not hypocrisy to think some jobs shouldn’t be automated. I don’t teach, but I definitely want human teachers teaching my kin, not AI teachers.

Perhaps, or perhaps not. We have not yet seen the true reach of pedagogy of AI. If AI can teach better than humans (something like the Matrix's brain uploading of training), then I will want to do that than have a human teach me.

Legal | privacy