Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

A Native American actor classmate of mine did a lot of tv during the era where Vietnam-based programs (e.g. China Beach) were running as casting directors would hire him for those parts (his hair was short then). I guess that's why you see self-financed stuff. Defiance has a Native American in a lead part, but I am hard pressed to think of anything else. Figure 2% of the population would give you something statistically.


sort by: page size:

Yeah but that would involve being willing to cast Asian men in leading roles and romantic interests on TV and in movies.

An overall more diverse production provides more pathways into the industry for marginalized people, and some of those pathways will lead to acting.

Many of them are actors from outside the country.

I’d think odds are the ones I’m seeing on TV or in a movie are paid. (Most of the actors are unpaid. Most of the sightings of actors are probably of paid actors.)

And so are background actors and actors you've only ever seen on infomercials, yet they're represented by the same SAG-AFTRA as movie stars.

Casting practices has changed drastically and there's been major increase in diversity of characters in movies/tv.

There's even been a huge increase in diversity of, ex, contestants on game shows/challenge shows.

There's just simply much, much more media made now too.


Artisanal textile workers, categorically, were not as talented as elite actors because the size of their competitive pool and the barriers to creating work were minuscule compared to that of Hollywood actors - who emigrate from all over the globe and assimilate to US culture to use their talent.

While a lot of cultural products (not art) like movies and shows are created like fast food, people are drawn to them because of the unique talent, charisma, looks, presence etc of the actors that participate. I don't see Avengers: End Game breaking box office records if it didn't have those rarefied individuals.

If you go back to my initial post, I pondered whether the original comment meant celebrity.


Most actors aren't either.

But the top 5% take home millions


Indeed.

With regards to Hollywood film making, if you look at startups, you can be any gender or race, but as long as you bring your A-game, people will take you seriously.

In Hollywood, you have to be a very specific type to make it as a performer, otherwise you are relegated to working in the background to help create the movie OR fitting a stereotype to be part of a movie. In the last few years, the only Asian actors I've ever seen lead a 'Hollywood' movie without being relegated to action heros is Harold and Kumar.


Foreigners in fairly racially homogenous places can get into acting / modeling / promotional gigs pretty easily.

A German friend of mine was randomly approached in Manila. She ended up playing a decently sized role in a local movie. No acting experience. I also auditioned for some commercials; the casting agent thought I was handsome. Uh, I'm pretty unremarkable at home, but sure. I'm terrible at acting but it was a fun little activity I'd never have gotten to do normally.

It would be a hilarious twist in life to become a star in another country like this guy has.


Didn’t you know? There are two types of actor. White male and political.

Acting.

It's also a great place for motivated actors to pour gasoline on some minor embers and turn them into a wildfire, allowing an irrelevant minority to seem like a representative majority.

Television/film casting is like that. Being from Los Angeles I had dabbled in "extra" work a bit (still have my expired SAG card! :) Casting agents always need certain looks or skills, e.g. someone tall with red hair that can horseback ride, or has a running car older than 1970. Stuff like that goes out in casting calls, and the best they can do is ask people to work their social network in the traditional way, i.e. family or friends they might know etc. Come to think of it Hollywood in general is pretty low tech...

For the curious, eligible movies must satisfy at least one of the following criteria:

At least one actor from an underrepresented racial or ethnic group must be cast in a significant role.

The story must center on women, L.G.T.B.Q. people, a racial or ethnic group or the disabled.

At least 30 percent of the cast must be actors from at least two of those four underrepresented categories.


I think there are foreign actors. But I don't think that's the entire explanation. I think rather they're taking advantage of rifts that were already here. And there are plenty of home-grown actors taking advantage of these rifts as well.

How is this different from the past where people wanted to be actors on TV and/or movies?

When I was growing up I remember some said they wanted to be Barbie, or GI Joe.

Cultural influence will always be a “thing” as it were. Doesn’t mean it stays a primarily thing or wha t have you. I don’t think it says anything meaningful about someone’s future per se


How often do they see themselves represented positively in TV and movies?

Then you get creative like Mark Normand (who looks like a garden variety white guy) but draws a lot from his settings and surroundings.

I don't blame people for using their physical idiosyncrasies or ethnicity to get their foot in the door. But you're right in that it only goes so far and you gotta evolve.

next

Legal | privacy