Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Here's ngram -- a measure of use in books: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=%22welfare+que...


sort by: page size:

Try reading Mother of Learning.

I think the alliteration in her name and the fact that it's an annual report ("Oh yeah, I read this last year") contribute too.

In which case she probably has read the book.

Any of her descendants here on HN? She had 11 and it's been more than half a century now, so there should be at least one or two HN readers.

> Women flat out effing dominate literature historically > women in literature are ... highly respected

Let's suppose for a moment that this is true. What would be a useful way of testing this? One thing that comes to mind is the Nobel Literature prize. I found a list of female winners: https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/women.html and it appears that prior to Gordimer's winning in 1991 which opened some floodgates, women won in 1966, 1945, 1938, 1928, 1926, and 1909. That's six in 90 years.


Considering that The Handmaid’s Tale was published in 1985, I’d say her work has lasting value.

Thanks. I corrected her name. What culture influenced reading can produce :)

The Lindy Effect [1] would say that the best guess is that they'll still be reading her 95 years from now...

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindy_Effect


Google Books picks up the source for the quote, at least.

http://books.google.ca/books?id=7irAXGiBBoQC&lpg=RA1-PA8...


So she had a life worth of one of her books. I remember how popular she was when I was a child.

Which book? She has quite a few published.

You should update the Wikipedia article with your findings https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_As_She_Is_Spoke

I think it might be based off a fair amount more than that, she's been publishing since 1993.

I'm curious how you came to that conclusion. How are you measuring the level of harm as a result of her books?

Thanks for the reminder :) I was just thinking of Mariel not too long ago. I should see if the library has it.

> So she was popular and so - that probably was true for many, many people throughout history.

The weird thing is that she seems to have been popular, yet she isn't mentioned (so far as I can tell) in the main sources of pre-20th c. biography (e.g. the DNB). Uncovering such minor but influential figures that hadn't yet been comprehensively described has always been a main interest of historians and antiquarians, so I think this author's work can be described as a very real accomplishment.


"The woman who went to the library and read every book on the shelf"

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/aug/16/phyllis-rose-t...


They say she was a voracious reader as a child.

Because she is famous (over 100K followers on twitter) ;)

On a more serious note: Because there are some books in this list that at least I've never heard about but sound interesting.

next

Legal | privacy