> Women flat out effing dominate literature historically
> women in literature are ... highly respected
Let's suppose for a moment that this is true. What would be a useful way of testing this? One thing that comes to mind is the Nobel Literature prize. I found a list of female winners: https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/women.html
and it appears that prior to Gordimer's winning in 1991 which opened some floodgates, women won in 1966, 1945, 1938, 1928, 1926, and 1909. That's six in 90 years.
> So she was popular and so - that probably was true for many, many people throughout history.
The weird thing is that she seems to have been popular, yet she isn't mentioned (so far as I can tell) in the main sources of pre-20th c. biography (e.g. the DNB). Uncovering such minor but influential figures that hadn't yet been comprehensively described has always been a main interest of historians and antiquarians, so I think this author's work can be described as a very real accomplishment.
reply