Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Alright, different attack angle: you wouldn't have reached 70k readers in 1910 because the barrier to entry for mass circulation was much higher :)


sort by: page size:

It's all relative. Obviously I mean that it sounds vastly more recent than 1914 to my ear.

And anyway, I confess I don't know the industry at all, but I doubt anyone would talk about 1914 as representing 'modern publishing'.


Good point. Follow-on question then: why did they push for it last time? Was 1920's content more valuable at that time?

> But the company is 110 years old now

Almost 113 ("14th day of June 1911"): https://books.google.ch/books?id=_8tFAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA3428&redi...


For those dismissive of the content in comparison to current books and websites, bear in mind this was written in 1910

There are still more titles in 1880 than 1980 in Figure 2.

http://i.imgur.com/SzUjfj0.gif


I guess that depends on the literacy rate around 1900.

Hard to compare since the "27 markets in Europe" didn't all exist in 1900 either.

Quite so. The differences between 2000 and 1912 are hard to truely fathom. I don't know how you could possibly attempt to predict at that sort of timescale. Even a decade would be pushing it as far as I am concerned.

Why stop at the 19th century? It's not like the cost of transmitting information was less expensive before then, nor was it less centralized (people who had the resources/knowledge to propagate such information).

Will you expand on the comparison to half a century ago?

By decade you mean 1000pages (OP mentions 100/yr)?

It isn't that 1890 was modern; 2010 is lacking in advancement.

My comparison period was 1900 to 1920.

1901~2000? Does this comparison make sense?

I meant 1900s. Thanks, fixed

Wow, 1909 was a long time ago, in literature!

Interesting, I'll have a careful read of that but I must point out it was from 90 years ago, a bit outside my stated margin!

I had the same thought. The link is to a modern commentary about media created in 1900

> pretty high 100 years ago

irrelevant: there are no hard numbers for that and that's not the timeframe the article is discussing (since the 90s)

next

Legal | privacy