Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

RFP says 45 minutes to an airport with direct flights to Seattle, SF, NYC, and Washington DC. I don't know the area but it seems to me that YYZ is too far away to qualify


sort by: page size:

It's over 7 hours from Seattle, unless you mean on supersonic aircraft?

If I remember correctly, being within 100 miles of an international airport counts too.

With South West I took a 737 (definitely not the MAX, probably the NG) a few times from ISP (Long Island, NY) to BWI (Baltimore / Washington). It's not 30 minutes but close enough at 40-45 minutes. These flights were within the last 2 years.

You have it finding flights from SEA to YVR. That's basically pointless, it's 180 miles and I have a car if I drive up. Or train.

Cool otherwise.


I don’t know: San Jose - Seattle is ~900 miles or 1400km-1500km. That is 5-6 hours direct train at best at 300kmh. I don’t see this as something beneficial to a plane. Borderline comparable to flying and only because of slow TSA.

Sure, but it’s quite a flight from San Francisco

Not a lot closer. Tokyo to SFO on a jet is 9 hours. New York City to SFO is six and a half hours.

A lot of routes to Asia, which are still pretty far (10-12 hours to Tokyo). Nothing to Russia far east, which would be a bit closer.

I’ve been in plenty of international trips where I transferred in SF or even Chicago or New York. It is a bit weird flying down to SF just to go back up to asia.


Pretty much, I've done the Seattle-Vancouver hop in a 737 and that's only 130 or so miles.

> 5 hours from the east coast of the US sounds right, but Seattle to Reykjavic is over 7 and closer to 8.

Well, it takes about 5 hours to fly from Seattle to NYC. If it takes 5 hours to fly from NYC to Reykjavic, you shave 2 hours off because you don't have to stop and you're following the great arc. Did you think that tacking on an extra ~3000 miles of naive travel distance would only take 2 hours?


On number 4, if all you need to do is go in one day per week, wouldn’t the radius increase to how far you can get in a roughly two hour flight? This opens up Seattle, Boise, Salt Lake, Las Vegas, Phoenix, LA, San Diego...

Also if you're within 100 miles of an international airport.

> Tokyo - Seattle is about the furthest within that

There's about the shortest viable route I can imagine. I could see refueling stops being a thing, though. SFO-SIN is a pretty long flight, so an hour to refuel in Tokyo wouldn't be so bad.


Being along the coast also makes offshore supersonic flight possible. With a good aircraft, San Diego to Seattle should be about an hour.

No, it won't. This plane promises a range of 4,500 nautical miles. LAX to SYD is 6,500 nautical miles.

You can stop to refuel in Hawaii, but that will eat much of your time savings.


Damn I wish I lived closer. Flying there and back for a 1-day is steep for me atm, but I think it's an awesome opportunity.

Airports are in cities. Even 10 miles out to the ocean would make a massive difference without taking that long.

Maricopa to Boeing is basically 1/4 across the city. Try commuting from Maricopa to Discover at I-17 and the 202. That would be an hour and a half to two hours each way.

You can fly from California to Russia and back in less than 10.5 hours today, it's not that far from Alaska.
next

Legal | privacy