Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Almost nobody who loses their job wants to. It's still a net win for the economy as a whole that people lose the jobs that are no longer worth doing.


sort by: page size:

It's very simple: Lots of people have those jobs, and they either like those jobs or have no confidence that having to find new jobs won't end up as a net loss for them.

People who lose their jobs certainly do

It is good when people lose their jobs, actually!

Given how low unemployment is, it makes sense there are more people who fear job loss. In the past, more people were unemployed and thus could not feel afraid of losing something they didn't have.

Even if we had a healthy market, which we don't, the people who lost their jobs don't have "marginally less" income. They have zero income. They are not happy.

I don't see why job losses are a bad thing.

As long as we move quickly to "you don't need a job to live" because otherwise these job losses are destroying people's lives.


Thousands of people out of jobs at a time when they won't be able to get another one. Yes, that is good news /s

if there's massive unemployment many people are going to be happy just to have a job and will not want to risk losing it

What about people who lose their jobs or don't get hired in the first place?

26 million workers have lost their jobs in a little more than a month. The labor market might well be worse than the Great Depression. It doesn't seem to be a hard problem to solve.

Unless these folks had degrees in Working At Intel, losing a job is not the same as becoming permanently unemployable. Job loss sucks. But it's pretty hyperbolic to say it's destroying peoples' lives. Particularly for skilled workers, finding a new job isn't all that far out.

Not everyone has the luxury to just switch jobs. A large portion of the population has very few job options so they get exploited by employers who know they don't really have other options.

Saying that "job market was killed by people realizing they can subside off benefits" simply ignores the reality. A small but non-trivial percentage of people hold jobs only as much as they need to get the benefits back. Each such person knows a hundred more people, that now also know one can do this. But most of them don't like the idea of not having a job for cultural reasons. On top of that a job is more money, which is nice.

I think you may have misunderstood my post. A job loss shouldn’t matter, but sadly it does.

Losing their job is a violent and unpleasant process but a sort of necessary one as a society. I have seen that first hand many times. It forces people to reconsider their career, move to another more promising industry, move to another city or another country. That's how the economy adapts to change and resources are allocated efficiently.

What I have seen often too is bankers wealthy enough to be able to live on their savings for a long time, and therefore not willing to reconsider their career. And as a result staying unemployed for a long time before coming to the conclusion that they need to do something else.

I'm not saying this is fun and that I wouldn't mind going through it myself but this is capitalist's creative destruction at work. Not something you should feel particularly bad about.


No, a bunch of people are going to stay put making ~25% less than their peers because they don’t have the ability or inclination to change jobs.

When you've never had to work to provide for yourself and others, it's very hard to imagine the damage done from someone losing their job.

Most people need a job. That's not the same as being unable to switch employers, or being unable to move to a better market.

He meant if they were to lose their jobs and then have to put actual effort in to get a new one, like most people.
next

Legal | privacy