Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

The patty in the normal $1 White Castle slider is so thin, that the $2 Impossible Slider feels like an improvement already just because the patty is thicker.


sort by: page size:

Or was the first version 33% thicker than it needed to be to give them an easy win in version 2?

It can be made thicker.

The thin edge of the wedge, perhaps?

Is a larger slide and RIP increment needed then? Or can these never be made large enough?

But it's thinner and lighter.

Jony Ive says thinner and lighter will make it better.


I just looked at this and while there is no sliding, the bottom 3 have been really quite flat

And how much thicker is that thing? The edge around that machine is the worst as well.

Dream on, they’ll make it thinner

The more thicker, the more it is invisible.

Commercial-grade Reynolds rolls are both more economical and ~double the thickness.

> easier to put on edge on

The corollary to this is that they lose their edge quickly, which is annoying.


Well, that's way more friction.

It doesn't just look thinner. It is thinner. Yes, there is a hump around the base's hinge, but it is still significantly, noticeably thinner – per the article, the machine's volume was reduced by 40%.

Less friction?

Also it makes scraping much harder.

Also, maybe, the thickness?

I've not tried it but intuitively I'd expect it to slide about as well as other very hard things of the same shape.

Any thicker and we'd have to start cutting it into bars and marketing it on a shiny over-designed website.

Also, more peeling because of the higher surface area to volume ratio!
next

Legal | privacy