Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I thought mainstream economists are/were fully on board with that. :o


sort by: page size:

Yeah sure but economists love it. They built entire models around this idea.

Well they are economists...

If that's true, then almost all mainstream economists are diehard capitalists/anarchists. (Hint: They're not.)

... where'd the economists come into it?

Economist here. I completely agree

Economists have sort of walked back from that as a prevailing belief.

I genuinely don’t know anything about economics. Is this widely accepted among economists or is it more of an ideological/political axiom?

I'm not an economist, but I read a lot of what they write, and it seems like an established fact in the field.

This is the opinion of most economists.

That's the big thing that jumps out at me. There are very, very few serious economic policies that have this level of agreement among economists.

Greg Mankiw did a list a while back about what economists agree on: https://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2009/02/news-flash-economist...


I gave a clear explanation of pretty mainstream economics that no economists would disagree with. But okay.

As an economist: yes.

And they (the economists) may not be the only ones.

Indeed. The economists were presumably speaking relatively.

I'll leave economics to economists the moment economists can agree on, well, anything.

When some of the economists mentioned are the president of the International Economic Association, a a chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, and a Nobel Prize winner who also happens to be the economics columnist for one of the largest U.S. newspapers -- I think it's fair to say that these are representative of mainstream economic thought.

Completely agree. But to be fair, I think a lot of economists would also agree with you here.

Thank you for holding me accountable. The ideas I refer to (as much sense as they make to me) do not, indeed, seem to have much support of mainstream economics. (Contrary to what I thought before you had me look it up.)

I'm still not ready to write them off, in part because of the bias against professional economists you've already caught me exhibiting. But I can admit at this point that it's completely based on personal whim and not much actual substance, as long as the substance is determined by mainstream economics.


Yep that's why I said "almost"

I had The Economist in mind :P

next

Legal | privacy