Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

People who are security risks can't board.


sort by: page size:

Humans are a real security risk.

Security is a stance not a feature. Being caught vulnerable and on the back-foot can be /really/ hard to recover from. Do risk-based security, and be realistic about remote risks. It sounds like there are already concerns about identified risks.

Security was mentioned in the article.

Security isn't all or nothing, though.

Yes, security concerns.

Security is all about managing risk for you because you've already chosen to compromise on security.

Security is the main gain for many people.

Security from whom?

If you're being paid to secure a system, there isn't room for you to not secure the system.

I think the point is that security is everyone's responsibility, and everyone will need to chip in.

Hell, what about the security requirements?

They're interested in business security at least, security of their own business I mean.

Sure. Security is hard.

Thanks, understand your points clearly.

I'll point out that I did spend a lot of time, energy and money on application security at Engine Yard (and still do as board member) and I'm very proud of our security record there.


But, security..

Let's face it, security is a tough, technical challenge. The friendly slide decks with clip art of people shaking hands and "consultants" that make us feel good can only get you so far.

ok that's a scenario I didn't fully consider, lmao.

but humor aside, the point stands. safety/security is about tradeoffs.


You're giving away a security that is still considered a security. That doesn't mean it won't be regulated as a security.

"Security is highly concern."
next

Legal | privacy