Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

You're talking about the mass murder of easily 20 million people.


sort by: page size:

No, I mean the slaughter of millions of innocent civilians.

So are you saying that someone deliberately killed thousands of people? Or what?

I though the same thing until 9/11.

The 3,000 people killed were 20% of the 16,000 murders that year. It was by far the biggest mass murder in US history. Next biggest was 44 in the 1927 Bath School disaster.

And of course terrorism is a much bigger problem in some countries.


There's a very real chance that over 200 people were murdered in a single event - if that's not newsworthy anymore then that's a pretty fucking sad indictment of the state of the world.

Estimates of up to a million people dead, for something they didn't do. It was pretty bad.

Murdered a lot of defenseless people is more like it..

Killing hundreds of thousands of people is also aggravating.

From 1945 until today - 20 to 30 million people killed by the USA https://www.voltairenet.org/article204021.html

The U.S. Has Killed More Than 20 Million People in 37 “Victim Nations” Since World War II https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-has-killed-more-than-20-mil...

It's all just numbers to Americans. Zero empathy to the chaos caused throughout the world.


Haven't they killed thousands

Yes, killing over 17000 people, most of them women and children is not OK.

That's obviously nonsense. Killing 1M people is worse than killing 1.

Ah so you have information regarding the mass amount of people the US didn't like and has assassinated?

Let's see: killed a ton of people, was extremely expensive, ...

Actually it's not that complicated in this case. Except for the small matter of nearly 10,000 people needlessly killed.

Killing a cumulative 100,000,000 hardly constitutes "minor crimes".

Please provide a "counter-example" where the United States murdered 100 million people.

Thanks.


And the hundreds of thousands that have died over the past couple decades as we turn people's homes into war torn countries?

oh yeah, 10s of millions murdered sooo superficial

I feel like I'm going in circles here, but, this information shouldn't be used to justify nuclear mass murder, rather, it should be used to start questioning the conventional mass murder. It's not that 'we already were mass murdering people anyway'; it's 'on top of that, we were also mass murdering people with conventional attacks'.
next

Legal | privacy