Hacker Read

colejohnson66 · 2021-01-12 05:44:50+00:00

No. I’m questioning whether this article is being truthful in its reporting.

alpaca128 | karma 7759 | avg karma 2.86 · | 2023-05-05 06:46:42

The existence of this news article says no.

msie | karma 3297 | avg karma 1.69 · | 2019-10-12 16:52:49

Looking at another article on this site I don’t trust it has any journalistic integrity.

Sangermaine | karma 1348 | avg karma 4.12 · | 2018-07-23 13:01:44+00:00

Reuters yes. An Op/Ed in Reuters, no. You have to know you’re being disingenuous here.

freehunter | karma 23077 | avg karma 2.83 · | 2012-05-22 16:07:54+00:00

Yes, it's an opinion article about a real news story from Reuters. It's not Yahoo making up the news.

kgrin | karma 1437 | avg karma 6.28 · | 2010-04-14 14:52:58+00:00

Maybe, but the article doesn't actually present any evidence that that's what's going on.

mycelium | karma 221 | avg karma 3.03 · | 2015-09-16 06:45:48+00:00

Have you read the article? If that's not legitimate journalism I don't know what is.

HPsquared | karma 7582 | avg karma 2.12 · | 2024-04-17 08:14:44

Maybe because it's an article commenting on a trend of inaccurate reporting, and is itself inaccurate.

tomatsu | karma 377 | avg karma 2.97 · | 2018-04-18 19:09:20

It seems that way because the headline is a lie.

AlecSchueler | karma 3231 | avg karma 2.1 · | 2023-11-17 05:33:07

Because they covered news that I thought was interesting to the community here. Is there a problem with this article?

dekhn | karma 28741 | avg karma 2.63 · | 2021-09-01 09:25:52

i believe this article is simply mistaken, like it's propaganda or misinformation designed to hurt america.

feverishaaron | karma 833 | avg karma 4.5 · | 2008-07-05 04:13:08+00:00

yep. I would vote the main article down for being inaccurate if I could.

jareds | karma 1277 | avg karma 2.92 · | 2023-05-26 13:23:50

Based on the domain this article was posted at I don't think it's worth my time to read it and determine if it is good reporting.

NotAWorkNick | karma 678 | avg karma 8.07 · | 2022-03-09 07:06:56

" The reports were inaccurate, based on misinterpretations of the documents, which were real. " (TFA, 4th Paragraph).

So does that mean the article's title is clickbaitish?

I think I might need some more coffee

reply

emilfihlman | karma 668 | avg karma 0.77 · | 2020-01-07 20:56:05+00:00

100%. This is not a good thing and the article here is pretty much a bought piece.

sneak | karma 23753 | avg karma 1.62 · | 2023-01-15 13:48:15

If I made any false claims in the article, please let me know ASAP so I can correct them. I was very careful to report facts only and let the readers draw their own conclusions about what is happening here.

smt88 | karma 21138 | avg karma 2.28 · | 2021-09-17 10:33:42

This is an opinion piece, not news or journalism. It hasn't been fact-checked.

smt88 | karma 21138 | avg karma 2.28 · | 2021-06-02 14:24:33+00:00

This is an opinion piece, so it's not journalism and has not been fact-checked by FT as such.

valar_m | karma 852 | avg karma 4.14 · | 2018-05-08 15:19:47+00:00

I have no evidence to support it, but this article feels like bought and paid for PR.

COGlory | karma 5901 | avg karma 5.19 · | 2024-01-31 11:08:58

What part of the article isn't factual?