It's a editorialized headline that only appears on HN. The submission itself (it's content) doesn't actually say anything like the title is (was? Seems title changed)
Seems like that was just a silly headline that shouldn't have been put into submission title on HN (the page doesn't put it into its title tag at all).
Am I missing something? The only thing pointing in that direction I see is the submission title here on HN, which is in no way reflected in the article?
Yes, the submitter broke the HN guidelines by editorializing the title. On the other hand, the article's official title is uninformative. So I replaced it with the sentence from the article that most seems to describe its content (shortened to fit 80 chars). If anyone can suggest a better title, I'll change it again.
reply