Because plan B takes way more effort than just avoiding the need for one.
reply
It's not worth the risk.
Not trying creates the unintended consequences of a double suicide rate.
Maybe it's worth trading one set of unintended consequences for another.
They should have thought about that on day zero.
If someone else is picking up the tab then there is ALWAYS the possibility that someone will pull out for whatever reason.
That's entirely the point.
It’s a risk they take because there’s no other choice.
I prefer to get things done.
Depends on how hard you want to try or compromise on.
Can't it be both? I feel like when people talk like this, it abstracts away from the concept of a bad decision. Everything's a tradeoff! Sounds great until you hit actual consequences.
I don't think obstinance only works. Being a curmudgeon doesn't prevent one from having unprotected sex. :)
And I say this as someone who just says no to everything ;)
If you are done with predetermined quota, one can go under the knife and start shooting blanks at no bodily cost.
Which is a well-proven failed strategy.
No, this works both ways, the caution also applies to not doing it.
This is pretty much the anti-science 'precautionary principle'
Unless you have an underling reason not to do it, which you might but you should discuss if you do, then this is bad advice.
Awesome idea, thanks!
Choosing something else - at least if you can do it before getting locked in.
Or, what I consider more likely, people not trying but nature, um, finding a way. None of the common prevention methods is 100%.
But I do understand the temptation.
So if there wasn't a better way you'll do it?
Delusional excuse. You have options to do without or use an alternative.
Not by much, once you understand the consequences.
Because plan B takes way more effort than just avoiding the need for one.
reply