Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

The infamous German tabloid/gutter press Bild also pays you money for videos or photos and credit you as "citizen journalist". Similarly news agencies ask you on Twitter if they can use your footage.


sort by: page size:

There are also “De Correspondent” [1] in the Netherlands, which inspired “Krautreporter” [2] in Germany and “Republik” [3] in Switzerland. Both De Correspondent and Republik set new records for crowd-funding in journalism, with the latter raising on the order of 3.5M USD. These projects used crowd-funding as initial funding though, and not for individual stories. Their ongoing financing is based on paid subscriptions.

[1] https://decorrespondent.nl/ [2] https://krautreporter.de/ [3] https://www.republik.ch/


German journalists do. Sadly.

Most of the big German news sites require you to either accept ads, or pay for a subscription.

It is sadly perfectly legal afaik. Nobody is entitled to your content without agreeing to some terms. Luckily, archive.is works very well. Wish there were more alternatives.


In Germany younger people are more willing to pay for journalism. FAZ (a better paper) hires new journalist for example.

Don't German reporters need to be licensed?

Well, it is forbidden in Germany, but some newspapers will still do it, and then just eat the fine. BILD is very infamous for this.


Actually they do a pretty bad job. Most of the stuff they have is only available to subscribers [0] (Watch out for SZPlus). This topic is too big to put it behind a paywall, but in Germany the whole thing is already out of the focus of MSM. [1] (CTRL-F : Paradise)

[0]: https://projekte.sueddeutsche.de/paradisepapers/politik/die-... [1]: http://www.tagesschau.de/

EDIT: I just saw, they made more stuff available to the public, yet the concrete pieces on people using the system are paywalled.


Who else is reporting that other than Bild? Bild is a tabloid. I wouldn't put too much stock into it.

I'm sorry, I didn't want to imply that it's like Russia Today or similar. § 26 of the Act kinda forbids that and the work they do is usually superb and important. Especially in countries that lack democratic media.

There is however a difference and you can see it on articles as the one above. I'm sure no journalist was pushed to release this article in this way but this is what happens when you're funded by the current Government and have to report something they won't like. You just leave out certain information here and there and with that you change the overall tone of the information.

This is the article by the main news outlet of the normal German public service on the same topic:

https://translate.google.de/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=ht...

PS: German Government means the "Federal Government or the "Cabinet of Germany": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabinet_of_Germany


Sounds like a perfect fit. Axel Springer publishes "Bild" in Germany which is essentially the written version of click bait/sensationalism.

To be fair, anything that's German and has "BILD" in its name cries out "tabloid".

> "spiegel.de and bild.de have the main article behind a paywall. They don’t do this for important news."

As a side note:

This seems to me a weird business model, why pay for unimportant news?

Wouldn't it make more sense to bring important news behind a paywall?

Can someone explain? Thanks!


Yes, there’s a German platform that did this fairly successfully: Krautreporter [1] (the article mentions that they were in turn inspired by a Dutch magazine). I know nothing about their finances but they seem to be doing well, and have established themselves as a somewhat niche but serious competitor.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krautreporter


That's true. I actually don't know how the incentives are structured for executives in the German broadcast but they seem to reward creating quality, unbiased news.

If you look at the most popular newspaper in Germany which is essentially a tabloid it's clear it's not because there is less demand for that kind of trash in Germany.


Lawyers from a "famous" german yellow press publication once, like years ago, said:

"Journalism is only a vehicle to deliver ads to the reader."

(free translation)


Seems to be quite common practice for some news outlets here in Germany. I remember that I read a court decision stating that this would for some reason be acceptable. Not sure if it really is though.

Deutsche Welle is to Berlin what Russia today is to the Kremlin.

This aint journalism but state propaganda; and that makes this video interesting! Thank you for sharing.


Germany has exclusions for persons and events of public interest. So journalists can still do their job.
next

Legal | privacy