Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Very unbecoming of someone in his position. Seems people were right to be concerned.


sort by: page size:

From what I recall it was more that some people (not sure if they were students) were feeling harassed by his behaviour.

He should be worried about the fact that he accepted other people telling him how to behave. THAT'S humiliating.

I mean, if he actually really behaved like that, that's deeply shameful and he should resign

The more alarming part of this is how incompetent the guy was. If he'd been just slightly less obvious it sounds like he'd have gotten away with his campaign of harassment.

I agree, and frankly I think it's a bit disgusting for people here to monday-morning-quarterback this man and his motives and decisions.

If it was easy to avoid the situation, he would have.


Why is that? He has been behaving terribly, I would be concerned about the ethics of anyone who doesn't hate him at this point.

Seems like he's being made an example of. A clear and stern warning to others contemplating similar actions?

Eh we don't really know what happened and to what extent he was badmouthed. If it's as bad as he says, then yes that was uncalled for

It's not politics, it's human decency, and he violated human decency.

He has stated he does such. Which is why some people are upset, apparently.

He's also being targeted for his behaviour in the workplace.

It's as if his great work contribution warrant some kind of free pass for abhorrent and unacceptable behaviour.

I read the comments on the article, and looks like some of his colleagues posted on there saying he had embarrassed some good ol' boys, and the good Lord knows we can't have that, now can we?

I think this is a shame that he was hounded out of his job and the organisation because of his personal political stance. I disagree with him 100% on the issue but this is not a result that furthers any cause and doesn't cover anyone in glory.

His position was not reasonable. I'm not taking about civility.

I agree, it is shocking.

And with my other comments being downvoted, it’s incredible that people are so up his arse that they live in a bubble thinking that it’s ok to belittle someone like that.

Imagine working under someone like that… wow.


They were professionally embarrassed. Hence the agressive stance towards him.

My qualm is with the term "vilified." It implies that he is being done undue harm - he's getting what he should be getting. He should not be in a leadership position.

It sets an extremely bad precedent that he was hounded so vehemently for a personal opinion he never brought to the workplace, and which is fairly mainstream, whether or not you agree with it.
next

Legal | privacy