Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Downvotes are not censorship.


sort by: page size:

Downvoting is downvoting, it's not censorship.

Downvotes aren't 'censorship'.

Here, downvoting is a means of censorship. It's not about the points but rather about being seen even when disagreed with.

Downvotes should not be tools of censorship.

Downvoting is also an expression of freedom speech. It's quite different from censorship.

Are you conflating downvotes and censorship?

In that case are downvotes censorship too?

Downvotes are not moderation, a censorship speech, or a statement anout the user's humanity. Votes are just a measure of popularity within a community.

it's not the same as censoring. its ranking. a downvote is an intent to rank some content lower than other competing content.

This site has a downvote button and an upvote button. The fact that people use that feature of the site (downvote), means the site is working as intended. It is not censorship.

Down-vote does not mean censor. It is just a community-oriented way to sort comments.

Down-voting can be used as censorship, if not used properly. As in downvoting because you don't agree with the opinion, rather than because the post is irrelevant, ad-hominem, or content-free. If you don't agree, post a rebuttal.

Downvoting falls under soft censorship. The term is loaded and has many contexts. Wiki has a good article, it's worth a read.

And to those downvoting this discussion, thank you for proving my point.


There is a huge difference between being downvoted and not being able to express your opinion because of censorship

IMO you should be able to express any opinion, and of course you'll be downvoted if you are a bigot or a religious nutcase

Right now Reddit is going full censorship, which I hate


That’s not a reason to downvote. Downvoting is a censorship tool.

fine with downvoting, just no banning or censoring for unpopular opinions

> Downvotes don't mean censorship.

Good question. I think it does if downvotes result in inability to express an opinion (as opposed to simply having downvotes shown).

If downvotes are used to suppress freedoms then downvoting is a means of censorship. In other words, there is no big difference between prohibiting something by one person (dictatorship) or by 10 persons (collective dictatorship) (if it is not prohibited by law of course).


By the way, downvoting can be abused for censorship here. I think only upvoting has right to exist.

Well, the article is linked a few threads below, you can be the judge yourself. The whole concept of up/downvoting is based on having some kind of an opinion on a topic, which doesn't necessarily equate to hard censorship.
next

Legal | privacy