Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Citation needed.

There's this saying, "safety regulations are written in blood". The vast majority of regulations are written reactively, after something went wrong. (US regulations forcing minimum lot, yard, house sizes are notable exceptions).

Especially for something as a restaurant, where 1) people eat, so hygiene and etc. is important; 2) people will work; 3) people will visit, so you needs lots of insurance, health, fire etc. checks and OKs.



sort by: page size:

Safety regulations are written in blood as they say.

Safety protection regulations are written in blood.

The standard is "Safety regulations are written in blood." That's short enough and better than indirectly referring to it via a named 'law'.

And if not enough blood has been spilled, the rules can't get written. Safety regulations aren't just written in blood, that's all they effectively can be written in.

"Safety regulations are written in blood"

Regulations are written in blood, because trying to make everything safe pre-emptively is impossible economically for a number of reasons. Primarily being, you can’t (usually) realistically force people to spend the money on something that isn’t clearly an actual problem.

And that fundamentally means until someone ‘bleeds’/a big enough disaster happens, some things won’t get fixed.

See the triangle shirt waist factory for an example of what it took to be able to force people to pay for certain kinds of fixes.

[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_Shirtwaist_Factory_...]

Since folks aren’t currently burning down the NTSB’s offices or the like, it also seems like your opinion that the public is not currently adequately protected isn’t a majority one?

The only way we’ll ever hit zero accidents is if we all died tomorrow.


Because "safety regulations are written in blood". Disaster happens, reactive preventative measures help keep the disaster from reoccurring in that specific manner.

...in fields governed by science and stricture, anyway, like nuclear power or aviation.


Regulations are written in blood. This seems like blaming OSHA for poor safety when an incident they hadn't yet considered happens.

"Safety rules are written in blood" applies to parts of the organisation too.

Sure, there are some overbearing procedure monkeys who really want a process on everything, but a lot of "protection" rules are there because something really bad (and expensive, financially or reputationally) has happened before.


Safety rules are written in blood. Often someone has to die before action is taken. But eventually people forget, get sloppy, or consider the rules completely useless. See: nightclub fires.

It's not a problem when "progress" is easily determined. But regulations are famously "written in blood", created after some employee was a little bit too empowered and caused an accident.

For example, I'm very happy that employees of the nuclear power plant approval committee don't ignore safety rules even if it does impede the progress of the building process.


They say: the history of safety regulation is written in blood.

Safety regulations.

Safety standards were set higher and higher because accidents kept happening, resulting in some well-known extremely large scale disasters and numerous minor ones. As with every industry, the rules were written with blood.

When you are building a power plant which has the capability of making a significant portion of your country permanently incompatible with human life, you generally want to be really sure you aren't going to have an oopsie.


> Quite impressive for someone to read an incident report and actually implement the recommendations - so often they sit in a filing cabinet forever.

That's not really true. There is a saying when it comes to transportation regulations, "Safety regulations are written in blood." That is, nearly all safety regulations are the result of analysis after a tragic accident.


To your point, many businesses and facilities implement safety measures because they fear civil liability for preventable damages. I don’t think that’s likely in this case but if you can get most businesses and facilities to be mostly compliant most of the time, that might be enough.

Hence standards of safety to weed out the incompetent. As usual, written in blood.

I do not see where I said that. I am sorry, but you're projecting. Safety rules are written in blood; production safety rules are written in critical incidents and cold sweat. To err is human.

"This is why we have safety regulations."

The regulations don't matter if people don't know them or choose not to follow them.

next

Legal | privacy