Hacker Read

delecti · 2022-10-29 18:05:31

I thought the same thing. I had to modify the site CSS to even manage.

jcalve | karma 174 | avg karma 19.33 · | 2023-08-13 05:42:35

I noticed the same, what's going on? Too much complex CSS?

dcwca | karma 1090 | avg karma 8.32 · | 2017-06-25 23:27:06+00:00

It also doesn't look right if you turn off CSS styling.

secure | karma 4519 | avg karma 8.98 · | 2019-03-10 18:35:15

Sorry about that! I’m not great with Web Design, as you can tell. If anyone wants to contribute a CSS fix, or just a pointer to a good article on how to fix this, I’d be very grateful!

SileNce5k | karma 35 | avg karma 5.83 · | 2024-04-18 08:00:16

Yeah, I had to add background-color: lightgray to the css, and disable javascript to get rid of the cursors to make it the site usable.

titanomachy | karma 3833 | avg karma 2.88 · | 2020-10-09 15:06:14

Yeah, I edited the CSS before reading...

GuB-42 | karma 15915 | avg karma 4.0 · | 2018-04-13 21:30:45+00:00

I thought the same thing. Actually I thought "no css", make it the way pages look when only the html loads.

dangoldin | karma 7229 | avg karma 4.18 · | 2013-10-20 22:21:16+00:00

Hmm. That was not the intent. Let me take a look and see if I can fix the css.

Thanks for letting me know.

reply

teilo | karma 5618 | avg karma 2.81 · | 2011-06-05 04:18:03+00:00

This blog needs some serious CSS tweaking.

mightybyte | karma 3004 | avg karma 3.84 · | 2020-12-16 20:57:50

If that's the case, then I would say the CSS was poorly structured.

PStamatiou | karma 9957 | avg karma 7.32 · | 2007-09-17 03:54:20+00:00

gah, they hard-coded styling. I tried to get rid of the awful, readability-hurting css in firebug but that did little.

hammyhavoc | karma 3326 | avg karma 1.23 · | 2021-09-21 14:24:58

Is it just me that thinks the CSS on this site is poor and makes the site difficult to read? Viewed it on Firefox.

kthartic | karma 184 | avg karma 1.77 · | 2019-07-04 08:52:46

God that site needs some CSS

sorahn | karma 660 | avg karma 4.85 · | 2014-11-25 20:37:33+00:00

That site specifically was a porn site. Our 3.0 upgrade of the site involved a lot "get this working, NEXT!" so the CSS is kind of a mess. I've got a nice stat page to show me just how much of a mess now though!

kthartic | karma 184 | avg karma 1.77 · | 2024-03-12 14:30:23

I feel all this needs is a little CSS to make things actually readable. In it's current state, it looks awful. Really confusing.

quickthrower2 | karma 24182 | avg karma 1.71 · | 2022-04-03 12:33:40

That sounds easy to fix, just some custom css?

magikaram | karma 115 | avg karma 2.3 · | 2021-06-04 16:58:20

Oh, well looks like I'll need to delve into editing the browser's .css now to adjust it to my liking.

apenguin | karma 12 | avg karma 0.6 · | 2015-01-21 04:48:03+00:00

Yeah, I changed the CSS with the inspector. I don't know if it's because I have a low resolution screen, but I can't actually read it at all without doing this.

phlux | karma 2041 | avg karma 1.91 · | 2011-01-18 14:07:56

Was anyone else expecting the thing to be fully CSS rather than a .jpg?!

mnml_ | karma 266 | avg karma 2.63 · | 2015-05-28 15:51:17+00:00

when I saw the page I pressed refresh thinking the css was broken. Then I realised thats how its supposed to look.