Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Well that’s the other thing - banning the account on Twitter doesn’t make this go away. It just means people will follow them on FB or just use flightradar24 instead.


sort by: page size:

Not only that, but he suspended the creator's personal account too: https://twitter.com/JxckSweeney, alt: https://grndcntrl.net/links

It seems that he also asked Flightradar24 to remove it: https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/n628ts, alt: https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=a835af


The biggest sign mentioned in the article is the insane number of tweets since the inception of the account - surely this must set off some alerts on Twitter's backend?

I know that this is an extremely difficult problem to solve and that they probably ban accounts in waves but with something as obvious as this you'd think that the ban could/should come more swiftly...


That's so embarrassing how they can remove any account. People do so many things to make their followers on twitter but if we start getting ban like this, I'm no more on twitter from now.

Twitter is still banned.


Maybe not disabling accounts, but they do shadow ban:

https://metro.co.uk/2018/09/06/twitter-admits-shadowbanning-...


It appears that all automated flight tracking accounts utilizing open source data from @ADSBexchange have been banned from Twitter, including @RUOligarchJets.

Shouldn't Twitter ban them too?

That's hardly the only option. They could simply lock the accounts in question without vanishing all data associated with them. This is how bans have historically worked. The Twitter approach of hiding everything is a counterproductive anomaly.

So banning the accounts is the end result? Aren't these throwaway accounts that can be recreated in a second? It seems like a reasonable concept to filter the Tweets from getting to me in the first place, I'm guessing a "spam box" is a little too complicated for Twitter though.

IMO the bigger issue isn't getting banned, it seems the more likely scenario is having the operator of the server decide for whatever reason to shut it down. This isn't likely to happen with Twitter.

But twitter is. And I don't know if they have option for country level ban.

doesn't twitter ban people for doing this?

It's incredibly difficult to get anyone who isn't a celebrity banned effectively from Twitter.

I think the article is saying Twitter banned the account at least partly as a consequence of the legislation, because they were worried about being fined.

There have been recent cases regarding Twitter bans too.

People can still SWAT you even after they've been banned from Twitter though.

Okay cool, now explain why Twitter shouldn't ban people.

This article is not correct. They are banned, here is the official tweet: https://twitter.com/lufthansa/status/1578879849577385984
next

Legal | privacy