Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Truly stable countries don’t have attempted coups at all, then, if you really insist on being pedantic.


sort by: page size:

Truly stable countries don't have coups at all. A coup of any kind is a sign of instability.

> Truly stable countries don’t have coups at all.

A failed coup attempt is not a coup.


They have a suspicious lack of coup attempts in the last decade.

A coup doesn't happen with democracies/countries, it's dictatorships that "survive" coups.

Just because it wasn't a very good or well organised coup attempt doesn't mean it wasn't a coup attempt.

A coup doesn't have to be successful to be a coup.

I'm confused by your comment. Plenty of western countries have coups; look at South America for example.

If that were true no coup d'état would ever happen in any democratic country.

They have had a military coup within the last decade, not exactly a bastion of stability.

That already encountered a coup? That barely happens in a democracy.

Why are there no coups d'etat then?

I get the sense that you just aren't familiar with any nations that actually have coups. Here, a list — it's very, very long, and most entries are from the last 50 years: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_coups_and_coup_attempt...

Do coups not exist?

lol there was no attempted overthrow. go back to /r/politics

If that's a coup, then obviously not all coups are worth worrying about. They really are not going to do shit.

Unsuccessful or incompetent coup attempt is still a coup.

How was it not an attempted coup? Not a smart coup, or one likely to be successful but a coup nonetheless.

Failed coup attempts are signs that someone wants the government to be unstable, but less so that it actually is.

Russia’s government has been very stable for the last couple decades, with little change in substantive authority even in the inter-Putin period when Medvedev was nominally President; certainly much less substantive change than in the UK.

(One might reasonably suspect its the kind of stability produced by a brittle regime that does not bend and is thus more likely to catastrophically break, though.)


It's not a failed coup. It's just not a coup at all.
next

Legal | privacy