Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

He's not saying don't build anything. He's saying think about the potential for misuse (and implying, take reasonable steps to prevent it). This seems completely sensible to me.


sort by: page size:

> You don't build great things by raising money, you build great things by building them.

Maybe not...but you might latest hardware, fancy offices, etc without risking a dime. Not a bad proposition :-)


I don't think that's the moral at all. The moral is that when you build on someone else's platform, they may decide to extinguish you at any moment.

That doesn't mean never build on someone else's platform, it just means to be aware of the risk and include it in your planning.


> Build better walls.

Rebuilding all houses in the world because someone creates a totally superfluous gadget. Seems reasonable.


Do I get it right? Your point is: we should just build anything, no matter if we think it's valuable?

Maybe. But as someone who prioritizes what we build, no one asking for it is a pretty strong signal not to build it.

He said "build", not "use".

Yes, but so? We shouldn't just be indiscriminately building anywhere we want, and risking lives.

If it isn't, they shouldn't be advising people to build on it.

Stated another way: the goal shouldn't be to build something, but to solve a problem for someone. Building should be a means, not an end.

In the same sense that developing slightly better buildings shouldn't mean tearing down old ones.

"People aren't using the hardware you're building. So stop building it."

Lets not hang anyone for wanting their work to “save the world” or be important in some other way, even if it is naive.

What he does have is a cool temporary structure. Maybe it can be made into a commercial product for residential outbuildings or durable camps. Maybe other people can take this design and make it their own. Maybe it’s just a concept build, without a practical application but some hobbyist potential.

Either way, it’s a pretty cool thing to build or read about someone building. The “frameless” feature that he discusses is interesting. The simplicity is interesting.


If you see someone pounding nails into his dick and when you ask what he's trying to do, he says "I'm building a house". It is fair to tell him that he's doing it wrong. That his proposed method will not get him any closer to a house than he already is. It does not matter that you are not also trying to build a house. It does not matter that you are not going to build him a house.

Knowing what will not work is important. And just because there is no proposed alternative does not mean we should keep doing the thing we know won't work. Especially when the thing we know won't work might even exacerbate the problem it is trying to solve. Sometimes, nothing is the right thing to do.


What's the confusion? The allegation is that choosing to build this represents, at best, incredibly poor judgment. The GitHub issue and GP post are good faith appeals to kindest possible interpretations of this work. To use your own example, explosives can be useful, but if you discovered that your neighbor was building pipe bombs in his garage, you'd probably want them to stop. "I'm not gonna use them. I just think they're neat." is not a convincing argument for them to continue. To extend the analogy a bit further, this seems comparable to discovering a box full of pipe bombs with a big "free" sign in front of their house.

The world will be fine if you don't build

In a thousand years someone will speculate about why the people of today didn't just build and exploit [x]. Stop messing around and go build [x].

>Don't build a custom house either. A simple home will make the process go smoothly.

I don’t get why simplicity isn’t more of a thing. Complexity is just asking for extra maintenance and the very high likelihood of something being done wrong.


My argument is practical, not theoretical. Platitudes and ideals are disposable when you have to actually build something.

Then don't provoke one. I'm not telling you how to build; I'm telling you to build.
next

Legal | privacy