It is not about me; and I actually think that if there is a safe and effective vaccine that vaccination should be obligatory.
This was just a Phase I (healthy subjects) and most of drugs/vaccines are successful at this stage.
Drugs are not software, you cannot ship a broken product and then fix it. Even if it is safe, but not effective, it would do more harm than no vaccination, as vaccinated people would change their behaviour.
No. There's a big difference between drugs and vaccines. The drug doesn't generally illicit an immune response, but the vaccine is designed to do exactly that.
My 2 cents : according to wikipedia : "A vaccine is a biological preparation that provides active acquired immunity to a particular infectious or malignant disease".
I don't know the word for the injection fighting an addiction, but it's not vaccine.
Not for an emergency use drug that doesn’t maintain herd immunity for a disease that is minimally harmful to children and is under immense selective pressure to break out of the vaccine.
Maybe you’ve got a bad mental model because of the word “vaccine.” This is not a vaccine of the kind we give children, in terms of what it prevents and the extent of data and knowledge we have of its side effects.
reply