Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I see -- I can understand how that might be a concern. I'm not sure it's really a valid moral issue, but I can certainly imagine it bothering people.


sort by: page size:

I agree that by itself it wouldn’t necessarily be a “problem” but even so, it would strike a lot of people as pushing the boundaries of appropriateness.

Do you find this problematic?

I don't know if that is really morally objectionable either.

It’s a sensitive subject for some, I think.

Why is it disturbing? Isn't that just a values-neutral outcome, or, are you saying it's disturbing from the perspective of academia?

Indeed. Most people I've talked to who have such views think quite a lot about that because it makes them uncomfortable. Myself included.

Can you expand on why you think it is wrong or problematic?

Right, it's the "pretty much" part that's a little disturbing. Would be nice to know why this caveat is always thrown around.

Idk, I didn't see an issue with it. He discussed the issue on an internal forum designed for such discussion using plenty of citations and sociological terminology. The fact that it made some people uncomfortable shouldn't mean it shouldn't be discussed.

It isn't as far as I am concerned, but it might upset some people.

That is absolutely not true. Do you think mothers, sisters, friends, etc. can't be capable of concern for the "moral well being" (for the lack for a better word)?

You don't have to be that conservative to find it at least a little uncomfortable or grimy. I'm not saying that should be the basis of law, but you must understand there's generally stigma associated.


Fair enough, I can think of a few situations where a facsimile can cause moral problems, sex I've mentioned, pedophilia, dressing up as a nazi/kkk.

Obviously that feeling isnt as wide spread as I thought though.


I don't really think anything bad will happen in this example. I'm just saying in general it's one of those things that makes me uncomfortable.

Depends who you ask. I have no problem with it, and I suspect plenty of others feel the same way.

Exactly. Thus, the discussion about the stigma around it.

I’m ambivalent about it in general, but curious in this case specifically.

You acknowledge that the practice is morally indefensible but at the same time you're actively trying to convince others they shouldn't care.

What a truly baffling (and concerning) serious of comments.


And I suspect it's the kind of thing that goes on more often than not in such cases...

(Also that one would consider troublesome someone pointing that situation, instead of the situation pointed at, is icky to me).


This is not satisfactory response. Put another way, what I'm wondering is what it is that seems unpleasant or morally objectionable about the OP's behaviour.
next

Legal | privacy