Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

This entire incident has snowballed from ridiculous to insane.

However, I find it interesting that Playhaven wasn't DDOS'ed for firing the guy. If they had acted rationally and didn't fire him, this wouldn't have been the unmitigated clusterfuck that it has turned into.



sort by: page size:

This entire incident has snowballed from ridiculous to insane.

However, I find it interesting that Playhaven wasn't DDOS'ed for firing the guy. If they had acted rationally and didn't fire him, this wouldn't have been the unmitigated clusterfuck that it has turned into.


This is apparently a retaliatory DDoS related to the firing of the Playhaven developer who was outed at PyCon

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5391667 http://venturebeat.com/2013/03/20/playhaven-developer-fired-...

SendGrid status: http://status.sendgrid.com/


Amazed at the immaturity shown by pretty much all parties involved here. The dev. guy, his employer, adria and now sendgrid. I mean seriously sendgrid ? The only way to stop the DDOS is by firing adria (not that i am supporting what she did). This says a lot about where we stand in today's tech. world.

Right, let's blame the intern game.

Didn't that server endpoint need an upkeep? Didn't they wonder why it's getting all the traffic? Maybe they were DDOSed or something?

Multiple people in that company knew exactly what they were doing.


Yea, I didn't remember anything about a DDoS being the reason Richards was fired, as opposed to just a PR person making a splash and bringing unwanted attention to her company. A non-central case of cancellation, and I have no real sympathy for Richards as a person, but it still sucks that it happened.

Just reiterating what others have said, its reasonable because he took time to think about it. I know if I was in his position and woke up to find out my servers were being DDoS'd to hell because one of my employees had caused a stir, I may have just stayed in bed.

Not sure I can believe Melon's reasoning, in any case he probably fired the team that can fight "DDoS'es", so, this is what we get.

It was a DDoS.

Nothing. He merely takes responsibility for it in one of his tweets, and subsequently claims it wasn't a DDoS.

I'm just saying, 'ask him'.


I was 'in the room' when this happened. From the people monitoring the site and getting it back online there was no suspicion that the amount of traffic was high enough to be considered a DDOS, it was just a small, low-traffic service that got unexpectedly crushed a là many that get suffocated by HN.

I suspect other reasons for bringing this up now.


We're investigating what happened, but we know this wasn't a DDoS attack.

If they DDOS'd the server by massive amounts of complaints I'd consider it different. However, a straight out attack isn't going to do anything.

'and this spike right here was our happiest DDOS in company history...'

First, because it demonstrates the extent to which a company can be brought to its knees by a group of hostile people organized online

I agree. This is frightening. Any concept of a DDOS being a "digital sit-in" are dumb. PlayHaven may also have been trying to avoid the mob, too.

Second because hundreds and hundreds of men here and elsewhere seem quite happy to align themselves with an overtly sexist, violently threatening campaign against an individual whose views they disagree with.

What do you mean by "align themselves"? Those are extremely vague words.

Do you mean "approve of"? Or do you mean "takes the same side as"?

Anyone who approves of the DDOS is a moron. Anyone who approves of death threats is a sociopath. The people who issued threats should be subject to criminal prosecution.

However, people can find themselves legitimately on the same side of an issue as a bunch of assholes. No one should be forced out of a position by the fact that disgusting people also have that opinion.[1]

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacy


Maybe it was a ploy to get a bunch of traffic to their server and temporarily DDoS it?

Or an actual DDoS, not self-inflicted.

"I understand the business reasons for caving to any sufficiently-large angry mob with grievances"

Yup. A DDoS attack was almost certainly going their way, and perhaps physical threats as well.


Your 14 y/o daughter is fired.

I tried to point this out below. It's not even a DDoS, it's fake news.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36561808

it's a 429 error, so the developer who posted this is an idiot. they're not even wrong. the 429 doesn't even touch twitter's infrastructure. the HTTPS TLS terminates at a Google VM, which gets relayed depending on the VIP used to hit it, but the traffic never gets past that Google VM. This is literally /HOW/ companies deal with DDOS.

https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/topics/infrastruc...

it's unbelievable that my median salary for the past decade is $3,000 after several years of "Startup" followed by "How to Start a Reboot of My Life"


There was a DDoS attack. Fixed.
next

Legal | privacy