Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

That in the hands of an eager government there would be no Turing, no civil rights movement, nor speeches that go "I have a dream". The problem is that many in US heartland will consider these to be a good thing.

EDIT: could someone please upvote mkmkmmmmm. I think I managed to downvote his comment when trying to confirm it.



sort by: page size:

i don't think we should assume it would be good for the country or community

I'm surprised by how little discussion there's been of this seeing as it, at least to me, is just objectively a bad thing for the nation.

> no useful public transporation

it's united states overall, so it doesn't really matter.


"...but it takes place far away and the benefits are difficult to see..."

This worries me. It's like saying that because the people affected aren't here, in America, it's not worth doing.


I find that context unimportant and the thrust of the headline to be true and worth considering.

Even if only for a relatively small region, this government blocked access to information and communications.


True. I'm not sure what it will take for the general public to accept this. At least the politicians don't seem to intend to tell them any time soon.

His point is that plans like this are generated regardless of the current state of the country, therefore it says nothing about how polarised or at risk of rebellion America is today.

"No country is going to do what it takes"

That's not being realistic. That is decidedly pessimistic and something that no one could say at this time.


I don't disagree with that but that makes "nobody wants this" even less likely, they have to know about it first.

I was hopeful, perhaps naively, that sending some knowledge workers into the rural regions of our country (U.S.) might help to alleviate both the cultural and economic divides that plague our society.

But I guess Google & others don't care.


I don't think that helps accomplish one of the main goals of this effort, which is to demonstrate independence.

It seems you guys forgot about "home of the brave" part.

It looks like the US nation is out of tune with its foundations.


"- The US is also not very interested in trying to learn from what construction techniques, etc. have worked for public transit in other countries"

That would also apply to other areas like health care. Exceptionalism is not a good thing to improve yourself.


> network of influence

I cannot see how the "public/private partnership" programs, here or anywhere else, are not going to be focused on spreading that network. Perhaps I'm unduly pessimistic.


I fail to see how this will be a win for "the public".

That is no match for the general population's apathy. Seriously, "you can lead a horse to water" applies pretty strongly here.

I understand why people feel this way given the lack of public communication, but I'd like to put it out there that this isn't true.

US doesn't have any succesionist movement, that brings a thirds of the country outside.

That is a pretty disappointing situation for a country that is known for being "progressive."
next

Legal | privacy