Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

That doesn't make sense. A simple x-ray would show that the internal components have been removed.


sort by: page size:

Not finding the CF cylinder really does seem like the most telling part here. Given they've found the front, the back, and the bottom, you'd think the single largest component would be laying around in the same area. Unless ..

Yeah so I don't know what's going on. For some bizarre reason they didn't cut one open before squeezing. So we don't know.

Puzzling why they didn’t include inside pics with some of the damage.

The article actually says it's not ready for use, has no instruments and has not been tested under vacuum. It's a big steel shell.

So looking at the instragram post it looks like steel plates just screwed together. The screw holes are visible too so definitely a hollow shell. Makes it a lot less cool to me :(

It's missing the engineer frame where he has the box open and the apparatus in pieces.

That isn't the one piece of metal left, there are literally other photos of parts in the collection. That is just one piece of metal that they happened to post a photograph of.

Seems like a strange headline... the teardown apparently didn't "reveal" anything unexpected at all.

"Lack of opsec" is still all fine and good as a comment about this story, but this article is implying (really, more than implying) that they actually found something hidden in the fan.


Even if you do inspect it, you won't see everything.

That makes me wonder even more what the missing parts are.

I’m surprised they didn’t have this thing imaged and further forensics done on it. Certainly numerous device logs show other useful information. Maybe they did, and I missed it though, or it was intended as a read only device in the field.

None but I don't think that's what we're talking about. Have you seen the pictures in the article?

Enough that they didn't pay to have the metal layers "peeled off" one by one (or just all of them as Arubis suggests) so that we could start to guess what it really is....

Presumably there are moving parts involved, they are just too small to see.

I would say they did solve the mystery, there probably was no booklet, especially since internally there is metal rebar. bubbles could be from anything. 26 pages would have left a noticeable void.

Not the photos but the fact that the bolts are missing and there are are no witness marks indicating they were present when the door ejected.

I read it as though they might have miscalculated which tools they would need to open it, and now that it’s partly opened inside the “anti-atmosphere box” they can’t easily add additional tools.

So no one opened up one of these and looked at the components?

One of the critics said that the pressure vessel is subject to fatigue and is not inspectable, so even testing the final article is not going to help. They are not facing small engineering issues, and didn’t seem well equipped to tacle hard stuff (I would venture, by lack of money).
next

Legal | privacy