Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login
user: ddtaylor (* users last updated on 10/04/2024)
submissions comments favorites similar users
created: 2018-05-02 01:22:47
karma: 11964
count: 2039
Avg. karma: 5.87
Comment count: 1245
Submission count: 794
Submission Points: 4417
about: I'm just some guy.


user: wmf (* users last updated on 10/04/2024)
submissions comments favorites similar users
created: 2007-08-18 20:27:58
karma: 46152
count: 18758
Avg. karma: 2.46
Comment count: 18567
Submission count: 191
Submission Points: 3722
about: Wes Felter, expert in datacenter/cloud networking and containers. Previously worked at IBM Research and a large investment bank.



A sales person from the company contacted me a while ago to offer services, Jessica De La Garza <Jessica.DeLaGarza@rackspace.com> and talked about their services. They have always been about their "Fanatical Support"

Rackspace is all about customer service; that's why it was a good acquisition.

Small coins can use merge mining if they really want to, most don't because they have some far-fetched idea on how PoW should work (like "ASIC resistance" and other tarpits)

IMO the Merge will "prove" that PoS works and thus bring a lot of pressure to bear on PoW coins for being obviously wasteful.

Wait, you mean like https://crystal-lang.org/


For some time their Unified Driver Architecture (UDA) was touted as the solution:

https://www.nvidia.com/object/feature_uda.html

Its been around since at 1999.


AFAIK, these proprietary GPU drivers have been around forever.

The method they used of encoding the transactions into the output value of the transaction could be done a LOT cheaper if they just mine transaction hashes with 16-bits of prefixed data. It's not that hard to create a transaction over and over until you get the first 16-bits of it's hash exactly as you want (in essence this is basically what Bitcoin mining is, just simply on blocks instead of txs)

Also they could just do it with 4 transactions at 8-bits each too.


They can't because the algorithms are different. Mining uses double SHA256 while payments use RIPEMD160 and ECDSA.

To prevent MITM/downgrade attacks (such as by someone at the same coffee shop) you should always use an HTTPS link. Malicious parties can inject ads, trackers or botnet mining scripts otherwise. Here is a secure mirror:

https://archive.is/RTF2i


http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~perspectives/ should detect and warn about SSL MITMs.

The cynic in me thinks apple will find a way to create "approved APIs" or similar and sifeloaded apps will be neutered.

I think Apple would only be happy if those environments exposed all future APIs on the day they are released, which is a very difficult promise to make.

Does anyone know how long until PoS goes live?

CentOS people are saying 4-6 weeks.

I agree, Tether is simply the closest I have found to the joke claim on the SEC website, so I really don't know where they are getting that one from.

It's debatable whether Tether has a few inaccuracies or massive fraud.

I'll take a provider that is transparent over one that makes claims they cannot backup. cock.li is more transparent in that regard despite being a complete meme.

It's a backup company. I can understand that they don't back up the backups.

Uploading can still happen even without open ports. The open port part is that someone has to initiate the connection after the connection is established anyone can send anything in any direction.

All ports should be open between servers. (Edit: Ports should be open if you want. I'm not saying you should run without a firewall, but on a server the firewall is under your control, not your ISP's.)

A few of the DiSo protocols were based on XMPP instead of HTTP.


Remove GPC too.

Or just don't use GC.

Legal | privacy