I like this too. There's very little to criticize, since it basically tells it exactly like it is without too much embellishment, and makes intelligent, honest conclusions.
I noticed the simplistic language used too. But I found it refreshing as the author is able to cite more external material while keeping the reader's (or at least, my) attention to the core message. No distracting jargon or flowery language were employed. But it could also be how my simple mind functions too..
Actually, it wasn't particularly. It was intentionally written in very plain, common English, in a way that refers to concrete things, not big ideological abstractions.
I'm glad that they are sensible if you wade through this transcript. It'd be nice if they used descriptive terms consistent with their message, rather than reaching for fashionable cliches.
I also like the frankness and simplicity of their communication style.
No fancy buzzwords, to the point and speaks to things we all know are true but are typically not addressed or are wrapped up in spin. The first and last paragraphs are great examples.
The authenticity of it leaves me with a strong sense of trust and respect.
As an aside, I love the design of this mini-blog format. And I really appreciate the author who says just one thing and doesn't have the need to generate walls of meaningless text to convey it.
reply