I like this too. There's very little to criticize, since it basically tells it exactly like it is without too much embellishment, and makes intelligent, honest conclusions.
I also like the frankness and simplicity of their communication style.
No fancy buzzwords, to the point and speaks to things we all know are true but are typically not addressed or are wrapped up in spin. The first and last paragraphs are great examples.
The authenticity of it leaves me with a strong sense of trust and respect.
I like that it comes across as competent without sounding boastful. There's obviously pride in there, but balanced with honest commentary about parts that aren't perfect.
I enjoy how the author skips facts and reasoned arguments and just tells me how I should feel, which is mostly angry. Also I appreciate him assuring me I don’t need to critically think about or do any research on the topic at all. It’s just so obvious that the mainstream economists are wrong.
Agree. I think this is thanks to many journalists who don't even need to explain or justify their thought process anymore.
This article offers a highly accessible and simplified construct that allows anyone without the need for causality to feel "informed" and formulate an opinion.
p.s. I wrote a longer response about this in another comment.
I agree ... it's well-reasoned and well-writen. But gently deciding to do nothing is also the easiest thing to do and gives you the option to back-pedal later saying "more information has come to light".
As an aside, I love the design of this mini-blog format. And I really appreciate the author who says just one thing and doesn't have the need to generate walls of meaningless text to convey it.
I really enjoyed this style of writing. It respectfully expressed why he disagreed with someone else, but acknowledged that both he and said person achieved their results and had tests which covered that fact. Nothing inflammatory or overly partisan, thanks :)
reply