Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Are you sure? Engineers have no control over the isolated designers


sort by: page size:

Engineers have very little say in what to build.

Engineers were not encouraged to think independently.

Engineers aren't the ones paying for design, it's not their praise that's to be won.

Engineers aren't in the room when they decide who is doing the most critical work.

As far as I know nobody can just make changes unilaterally without another engineer's approval.

They are not "my" designers.

The design department is managed separately from the Engineering department. I have no control over their tooling, hiring practices, or deliverables.


The engineers are definitely not in charge.

Engineers don't set policy.

Yeah, re-reading the article the designer doesn't sound blameless.

I'm probably willing to let my claim stand without anecdote (deviations from design occur outside the engineer's control), but honestly it's the weaker point, so let it drop. The more important one is that engineers design within a set of constraints, and if these parameters are exceeded, it is not the fault of the engineer.


I'm sure these engineers weren't acting on their own here.

Two engineers who are not aligned with each other's goals will easily do the work of zero people.

No Engineer, no matter how smart, can sway a corporation directed by a political culture that has non-feature goals.

Evidently, only they are allowed to do engineering. The rest of us are expected to shut up and buy the products.

None of this is in the control of the average engineering manager. Seriously, 0%.

Designers try? It's not like engineers can always prevent bad management from interfering with good product

The whole point of the article is that the vast majority of engineering teams have some power. It's not a license to derail the company with technical OCD, but as in all things… "balance, grasshopper."

If the product owner directs work at a ticket level and never assigns it to anyone, it's their fault it isn't there. If the engineers have more autonomy than I've seen at a company are were able to decide what to work on, then sure blame the engineers.

No engineers at FAANG companies get to think, they do what the board members and execs tell them to.

Regardless, there's this contentious relationship between decision makers and engineers because the former can't properly evaluate the work of the latter. Because of this, they either a) let bad engineers get away with stuff they shouldn't, or b) over-compensate and refuse to trust good engineers. It's a lose-lose.
next

Legal | privacy